<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More OSes?  Are  You Crazy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php</link>
	<description>An Indian technology blog with reviews, opinions and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Swanberg</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php/comment-page-1#comment-48900</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Swanberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php#comment-48900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I get your point.  Are you saying that OSX is run on a lot of non-Apple hardware and is rock stable?  If so, then I beg to differ... but on the first point, not the second.

Apple seems quite litigious of anyone or any group that tries to offer a way to get OSX on non-Apple hardware.  Do a search for Psystar for a recent example.

The point is that OSX gains a lot of its stability from being able to be rigorously tested, which is only possible on a finite (and small) number of hardware permutations... i.e. Macs.

Conversely, Windows&#039; instability comes from the nearly infinite number of hardware combinations (and thus driver combinations) that exist.  I would submit that it&#039;s a miracle Windows works at all.

Thanks for the comment... if you could clarify your point further, I&#039;d love to discuss it.

-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I get your point.  Are you saying that OSX is run on a lot of non-Apple hardware and is rock stable?  If so, then I beg to differ&#8230; but on the first point, not the second.</p>
<p>Apple seems quite litigious of anyone or any group that tries to offer a way to get OSX on non-Apple hardware.  Do a search for Psystar for a recent example.</p>
<p>The point is that OSX gains a lot of its stability from being able to be rigorously tested, which is only possible on a finite (and small) number of hardware permutations&#8230; i.e. Macs.</p>
<p>Conversely, Windows&#8217; instability comes from the nearly infinite number of hardware combinations (and thus driver combinations) that exist.  I would submit that it&#8217;s a miracle Windows works at all.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment&#8230; if you could clarify your point further, I&#8217;d love to discuss it.</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McDave</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php/comment-page-1#comment-48895</link>
		<dc:creator>McDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyindia.com/blog/221129271.php#comment-48895</guid>
		<description>&quot;What he doesn’t seem to realize is that once the driver inconsistencies of the vast array of PC permutations grabs hold of OSX, it will be just as unstable, if not more so, than any version of Windows to date.&quot;

Yet in 8 years this hasn&#039;t actually happened.

McD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What he doesn’t seem to realize is that once the driver inconsistencies of the vast array of PC permutations grabs hold of OSX, it will be just as unstable, if not more so, than any version of Windows to date.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet in 8 years this hasn&#8217;t actually happened.</p>
<p>McD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

